In an opinion issued last week, a U.S. appeals court affirmed a lower court opinion that upheld actions by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in relation to tariffs imposed on Chinese imports during the first Trump administration. The court opinion has direct consequences for these

A U.S. court decision resulting in retroactive tariff collection on imports of solar products made by Chinese companies in several Southeast Asian nations has just been appealed.

In a recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, a judge dismissed an $11.5 billion claim against the government of China based on bonds issued by predecessor governments from 1898 to 1913.

In a petition filed yesterday, the Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to review an appeals court ruling that the "reciprocal" and "trafficking" IEEPA tariffs are not authorized by the statute, and is pushing for an expedited consideration of the case.

In filings made in late August, several affected companies have appealed Commerce Department decisions to countervail transnational subsidies involving alleged Chinese subsidies to producers in other countries.

As CTM reported yesterday, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled on August 22 that the Biden administration’s two-year suspension of anti-dumping/countervailing duty collections on solar products was illegal. This ruling allows for retroactive tariffs to be collected on billions of dollars of these products imported

In a judgment issued on August 22, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the Biden administration’s two-year suspension of anti-dumping/countervailing duty collections on solar products was illegal. This ruling allows for retroactive tariffs to be collected on billions of dollars of these products imported from