The Trump administration is continuing its program of imposing tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, with drones being the latest target.

Chinese drone maker Shenzhen DJI Innovation Technology Co., known as DJI, succeeded on one of its claims in an appeal in U.S. court, and will now have another chance to convince a lower court that its designation by the U.S. Department of Defense as a "Chinese Military

On August 5, China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and state regulatory agencies launched a sweeping, multi-pronged package of countermeasures, taking direct aim at recent U.S. sanctions related to forced labor and market restrictions imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The move signals a pivot toward

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has now filed multiple lawsuits in state court against Chinese companies, with the second one being against Anzu Robotics, LLC ("Anzu") for "misleading Texas consumers about the origin, data practices, and security risks of its drones, which are rebranded products of Chinese

Last week, a U.S. appeals court heard arguments in drone-maker DJI's appeal against a lower court ruling that found a U.S. Department of Defense designation of DJI as a "Chinese Military Company" to be permissible under a U.S. statute.

In a move late last year, which was updated yesterday, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) took action that will prevent the authorization of new imported drones, with Chinese industry leaders DJI and Autel Robotics to feel the biggest impact.

Drone-maker DJI has filed an appeal against a lower court ruling that found a U.S. Department of Defense designation of it as a "Chinese Military Company" to be permissible under a U.S. statute.