A recent report by a U.S. think tank suggests expanding the use of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 -- which can be used to exclude imports of products from companies engaging in certain unfair trade practices -- to target Chinese economic policies and practices.

In late July, we wrote about [https://www.chinatrademonitor.com/usitc-institutes-section-337-investigation-on-silicon-photovoltaic-cells-and-modules/] the U.S. International Trade Commission's decision to institute a Section 337 investigation [https://www.usitc.gov/intellectual_property/about_section_337.htm] of certain silicon photovoltaic cells and modules with nanostructures. As a brief follow-up, three answers to

On July 14, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced [https://usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2021/er0714ll1797.htm] that it had voted to institute a Section 337 investigation [https://www.usitc.gov/intellectual_property/about_section_337.htm] of certain silicon photovoltaic cells and modules with nanostructures,

The U.S. International Trade Commission has issued a notice [https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/02/2021-11594/certain-cellular-signal-boosters-repeaters-bi-directional-amplifiers-and-components-thereof-i] that it has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's initial determination "granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement." The investigation is

On February 22, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced [https://usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2021/er0222ll1725.htm] that it had voted to institute three separate Section 337 investigations of certain cellular signal boosters, repeaters, bi-directional amplifiers, and components thereof. The complaint in the case alleges violations

On February 1, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced [https://usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2021/er0201ll1711.htm] that it had voted to institute a Section 337 investigation of certain imported batteries and products containing these batteries. The complaint in the case alleges violations of Section 337