At the August 30 DSB meeting, a WTO panel was established [https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/dsb_30aug21_e.htm] to hear China's request that it be found in compliance in a dispute brought by the United States against the administration of tariff-rate

In a WTO complaint [https://www.chinatrademonitor.com/australias-wto-complaint-against-chinas-ad-cvd-determinations-on-barley/] by Australia against Chinese AD/CVD measures imposed on Australian barley (DS598), China and Australia have agreed to procedures [https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/

As we described here [https://www.chinatrademonitor.com/new-developments-in-wto-dispute-on-trqs-on-agricultural-products/] , on July 15 there were two developments in the U.S.-China WTO dispute related to TRQs on certain agricultural products (DS517): 1) the United States requested authorization [https://www.worldtradelaw.net/

In September of 2019, Canada requested WTO consultations with China in relation to Chinese measures restricting imports of canola seeds from Canada. Consultations were held in October of that year but failed to resolve the dispute. In June of 2021, Canada revived the dispute by requesting a panel. China blocked

On July 15, there were two developments in the China - Tariff Rate Quotas for Certain Agricultural Products [https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds517_e.htm] WTO dispute: 1) the United States requested WTO authorization to retaliate against China because China allegedly failed to comply

Australia has been pressing forward recently with two WTO complaints against Chinese AD/CVD measures. It requested a panel on AD/CVD measures against barley [https://www.chinatrademonitor.com/australias-wto-complaint-against-chinas-ad-cvd-determinations-on-barley/] (that panel was established on May 28, but is not yet

A panel was established to hear the WTO dispute on Chinese AD/CVD determinations on Australian barley.